Module 2

Site selection, before the first euro is committed

Compare candidate sites on one common basis, calibrated against a growing reference population of European sites, with planet and optimisation built in.

Portfolio Expansion · Site comparison
Existing DCs
5
monitored
Candidates
3
under eval.
Avg score
74
sono
Layers
9
active
Data Layers
Your DCs
Existing DCs
5
Candidates
3
Heat island
est.
IX points
Environment
Rivers
1240
Reservoirs
44
Power plants
62
Grid substations
187
HV power lines
341
Selected site
FRA-North-03
87 FRA-North-03 71 RHN-East-01 58 HAN-West-06 sono. Frankfurt Rhine-Main + - 15 km
FRA-North-03
Eschborn, Hesse
50.14°N, 8.56°E · 6.8 ha
87
Resilience score
Power 91
380kV line 0.9km · dual feed
Climate 82
3,540 free cooling hrs/yr
Compliance 78
EnEfG compliant · 1 open item
Infra 90
Low seismic · no flood zone
Adaptability 71
Liquid cooling ready · partial
Top ranked
Best grid access in portfolio. Taunus foothills reduce UHI exposure. Minor EnEfG gap addressable pre-build.
The problem

The same plot looks very different once you check the facts

It depends on what grid capacity is actually available, whether the water basin is under stress, or how many competing facilities are already queued for permits nearby. Today these are scored once, at acquisition, by a consultant, and the answer is out of date soon after.

Investors

Price assets on data that is already out of date by the time it reaches the investment committee.

Developers

Commit land and permits before the binding constraint, usually grid power, is visible.

Sustainability teams

Grid mix, cooling climate and water stress set a site’s carbon and resource footprint for decades.

The cost of the gap

Undetected risk becomes a stranded asset

The stranded-asset situation in Ireland was not a failure of ambition or capital. It was a failure to track one risk factor, grid capacity, continuously, before it became a binding constraint. When the grid operator froze new connections, projects that looked viable at acquisition had no path to power.

€176bn
Committed to European data centres, 2026–31. None of it is continuously scored.
€5.8bn
Already stranded in Ireland alone: land bought and permitted, but no grid connection.
Product

One score per candidate site.

Sono combines grid, climate and permitting signals into a single score, calibrated against a growing reference population of European sites, so you can compare candidates on a common basis before committing capital.

Power

Grid capacity

What capacity is actually available, and how the grid mix shapes the carbon footprint of the site.

Environment

Climate and water

Cooling climate, hazard exposure and whether the water basin is under stress.

Regulation

Permits and competition

Regulatory trajectory and how many competing facilities are already queued for permits nearby.

The question at this stage is narrow: should you commit capital here at all. The answer also sets the carbon and resource footprint of the next twenty years.

Inputs

Built on external data, no instrumentation required

Nothing has to be installed at a candidate site. Sono reads external data for every location you are evaluating.

Grid and power

Grid and power diligence for each candidate.

Model · Site viability

Climate hazard

Climate hazard zoning and exposure.

Model · Site viability

Permitting

Permitting risk and competing facilities in the queue.

Model · Site viability

Reference sites

A growing reference population of European sites to calibrate the score.

Common basis for comparison
Pilot

Evaluating a site?

Tell us which candidates you are comparing and we will show you how they score.

Request a pilot
Supported by